The main advantage of SORAnomics over Economics is that it is based on the dynamics of the human mind as explained by David Hume which was later applied by Adam Smith into his Theory of Moral Sentiments and The Wealth of Nations.
To David Hume and Eastern philosophy, the mind is a non-physical thing, different from the physical brain. Therefore, the mind's dynamics can remain the same throughout space and time, since space-time only affects physics and not metaphysics. A human mind living 2,000 years ago has the same dynamics as a human mind living today, and the same with a human mind 2,000 years from now living in a spaceship in a different galaxy. It will still feel pleasure and pain and use logic to drive its actions to avoid suffering.
Thus, the same maxims given by Smith on economic development which he observed from the Roman times up to his time in 1776 will still apply to humans from 1777 onwards until the human species homo-sapiens changes into a different one, like homo-futurus.
Currently, the only maxim of Smith on development accepted by economists is comparative advantage. His other maxims (mostly in Book 3 ) have been conveniently disregarded because it goes against the commercial system:
In Smith's system, the countries where natural resources come from should eventually process them as well. For example, the Ivory coast, which exports cocoa, should implement policies so that it will eventually make chocolates itself. This would solve child labour for good. However, this goes against the vested interests of chocolate corporations in richer countries which profit from the low cost of raw cocoa. Campaigns against African child labour might succeed in small cases, but can never produce any sweeping change, since those campaigns urge African governments to bite the hand of business that feeds them with the taxes that they need.
every prudent master of a family never attempts to make at home what it will cost him more to make than to buy. The tailor does not make his own shoes, but buys them of the shoemaker. The shoemaker does not make his own clothes, but employs a tailor. The farmer does not make shoes nor clothes, but employs tailors and shoemakers. For their interest, all of them employ their industry with some advantage over their neighbours. They buy whatever else they need with the price of their own produce...
By making those cheap foreign commodities at home, the nation’s industry is thus turned into a less advantageous employment. The exchangeable value of its annual produce is reduced by such regulations, opposite of the intention of the lawgiver. By such regulations, a particular manufacture may sometimes be developed sooner.After a certain time, it may be made at home cheaper than in the foreign country.Wealth of Nations Book 4, Chapter 2
Liberal policies work best in advanced, rich countries while austere policies work best in more backward, poor countries. China, a poor country, adopted liberal policies immediately when it opened up in the '90s. This created wealth imbalances, migration, ghost cities, wasted capital, increased pollution, territorial disputes and stock market crashes. Changing austere policies to liberal ones must be done gradually, just as a person cannot simply flip his entire mentality instantly and expect no bad effect.
Also, desolate countries such as those in the Middle East and Western China are naturally not suited for republican governments and liberal policies. Had the Bush administration known this, then it would have thought twice about establishing a democratic system in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Since the interests of merchants are usually opposite that of society, the government should use temporary mercantile capital or 'hot money' to build its national capital so that when the merchants flee in capital flight, the nation would have enough local capital to sustain its own economy.
When China opened up, American companies left the US, leaving a lot of Americans unemployed. In today's world where the merchant class dominates and is free to remove its capital anytime, the only logical workaround is for the government itself to spend for and maintain the economy in a system called Keynesian economics. Another workaround is for the government to go into business itself, as state capitalism. This is best shown by China's Huawei which dominates the telecoms industry. Mercantile economists, on the other hand, would say that governments should not go into business simply because they want to protect their business interests from a very powerful competitor such as the government.
Smith's economic system works in all states of society, from nothing or 'state zero' up to the advanced, prosperous state. State zero can occur after a natural disaster when society breaks down. A slightly more advanced state or state level 1 is when people live very far apart in undeveloped rural areas where they live off the land (when people have some lodging and clothing). (Described in Book 3 of the Wealth of Nations)
A people in a rural village will likely not have any technical skills nor even speak the national language. But they will likely have some agricultural skills or skills in extracting natural resources. In this 'rude state', this will be their most important capital, source of revenue, and the center of their economy:
Our SORA system implements this first with a disaster relief system to provide relief, followed by an agricultural system to grow food for the society. This can then be traded using trade system to encourage economic growth beyond food. These systems can help the rude society grow crops for themselves and to be sold to other societies who will then make investments to help increase the quality and quantity of production.
For example, after a natural disaster, foreign charities or NGOs can donate relief goods and capital via SORA Relief to restart a town's agriculture. The locals can then trade their crops using SORA Agreeculture and use SORA Market to get more consumer goods directly. In time, they can export their crops and goods to those foreign donors using SORA Trade.
Even without a disaster, the system can be used to develop a society. In the African case, the unskilled rural areas of the Ivory Coast can produce cocoa beans (level 1) using SORA Agreeculture. They can then use SORA Market to look for more advanced societies of bean grinders and roasters in towns (level 2) to process the beans. Those roasters can look for still more advanced societies in cities (level 3) to liquify the beans into chocolate butter for making chocolates. Those cocoa processors can then turn to commercial cities and ports (level 4 or 5) to export those chocolates overseas using SORA Trade. In this solution, the revenue of chocolate-making mostly goes to the Ivory Coast, instead of to overseas interests, allowing the Ivory coast to build its capital and wealth.
The development of the rude state will then depend on the nature of the people, with some cultures being able to develop faster. Regardless of culture, Smith guarantees that by allowing profit-sharing or giving the people the proceeds of their own work, industry and development can be sped up. While profit sharing is the main expedient to speed up development, grain-based valuation or supply chain barter is the main expedient to prevent the society from sliding backwards during economic crises.
Indicate your name, email, and interest to know when SORA will be available in your city or get updates on business opportunities or theories